It is now over three years since whistle-blowers lifted the lid on issues in Casement Aerodrome, Baldonnel.
Five years have passed since the first personal injury claim against the State was lodged in the High Court.
The Irish Examiner reports that first highlighted these issues were published over two years ago.
With some exceptions, very little progress has been made in addressing the concerning matters at the heart of this scandal in the intervening period.
Writing in this newspaper last year, columnist Michael Clifford noted how there are two categories of inquiry frequently undertaken by a State agency or government organ.
“The standard inquiry is designed to find out whether something went wrong, how it happened, and who may be responsible,” he wrote.
“The other category frequently used, we shall refer to as the Mickey Mouse inquiry. This is designed to respond to a controversy.
“Turning over stones and digging for information is not the primary function of a Mickey Mouse inquiry.
“Instead, the main focus is to present the inquiry as an exhibit to show that something, anything, is being done,” he said.
Mr Clifford was referring to an inquiry into allegations by a Prison Service whistle-blower and recalled the initial attempts to “investigate” issues raised by Sergeant Maurice McCabe.
But he could easily have been referring to the lip service the Government has paid to serious allegations raised by Air Corps whistle-blowers, some ex-Defence Forces, and one still serving.
Read full article on Irish Examiner website below…